<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mille Bornes and Copy Cat Games &#8211; Flattery or Great Improvements?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegameaisle.com/mille-bornes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegameaisle.com/mille-bornes/</link>
	<description>Board, Card and Dice Game Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: filmbeats</title>
		<link>http://www.thegameaisle.com/mille-bornes/comment-page-1/#comment-4539</link>
		<dc:creator>filmbeats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 02:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegameaisle.com/?p=374#comment-4539</guid>
		<description>Have you ever considered a feature where you do a comparison of very similar games?  I find that when searching for board games that a lot of games seem similar to each other and sometimes it&#039;s hard to tell the difference like for example &quot;win lose or draw&quot; vs &quot;pictionary&quot; or &quot;the game of things&quot; vs &quot;what?&quot;.

You could possibly start out with briefly mentioning what all the games have in common followed with more detailed breakdowns of the slight differences in rules concluding with which differences end up working out better.

Maybe you could call the feature Copy Cat Comparisons?  I think you&#039;d be very good at doing this sort of feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever considered a feature where you do a comparison of very similar games?  I find that when searching for board games that a lot of games seem similar to each other and sometimes it&#8217;s hard to tell the difference like for example &#8220;win lose or draw&#8221; vs &#8220;pictionary&#8221; or &#8220;the game of things&#8221; vs &#8220;what?&#8221;.</p>
<p>You could possibly start out with briefly mentioning what all the games have in common followed with more detailed breakdowns of the slight differences in rules concluding with which differences end up working out better.</p>
<p>Maybe you could call the feature Copy Cat Comparisons?  I think you&#8217;d be very good at doing this sort of feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefanie Summerer</title>
		<link>http://www.thegameaisle.com/mille-bornes/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefanie Summerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegameaisle.com/?p=374#comment-91</guid>
		<description>My in-laws love this game.  My father-in-law says that coup-fourré means &quot;Ha ha, you can&#039;t do that to me you sucker!&quot; in French.  It&#039;s a fun game if you don&#039;t take it too seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My in-laws love this game.  My father-in-law says that coup-fourré means &#8220;Ha ha, you can&#8217;t do that to me you sucker!&#8221; in French.  It&#8217;s a fun game if you don&#8217;t take it too seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

